Showing posts with label genre: detective fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label genre: detective fiction. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Clichés - Why Yes, They Work

Today, we’re going to talk about something else that a writer uses a lot, even though they shouldn’t.  They’re clichés, the tool in our arsenal that we’re not supposed to use, because nobody wants to read the same thing twice.  However, as much as that is true, I have an argument for why they actually work.  You might have heard this argument before, which I’m hoping isn’t the case, but here it goes.

Clichés work because, at the core of nearly all stories, we’re retelling something.  It’s a new idea or a new way to go about it, but, honestly, we’re copying a lot of the same stories from before.  Here’s another curveball for you – it’s not a bad thing.  It’s literature’s natural selection.  These stories get retold, in different formats, because they’re the stories that we want to listen to.  They’re the stories that are going to survive throughout generations, even if only a small handful of people read them.  It’s why, at the library, they have those sample bookmarks of “if you like Neil Gaiman” and then a list of other authors to try.  It’s because even though one book is different from the next due to characters or plot, we see we’re going on the hero’s journey.  We see that the detective is going to attempt to catch the killer and will or won’t by the end of the novel.  We see there’s going to be romantic tension until the couple gets together and then torn apart again only to have a happy ending.  We see, in literary fiction itself, that a main character goes from being a kid who lost his mother because of his best friend to someone who accepts the greater mysteries of life.  Now, Prayer for Omen Meany has a bigger meaning than the one sentence version I just wrote out.  You should go read it and it’s one of my favorite novels.

Going back to clichés, before I bury the lead entirely, is that we’re told it’s a bad thing.  It’s a no-no.  But, considering all that we know, is it really true?  I don’t think so.  Considering the amount of television on right now that is either a procedural – thanks to ER or Law and Order or soap operas – or comedy that follows a certain pattern, it’s showing that we want the clichés.  I can even point it out in literature where you cannot find a good fantasy novel where the male main character and the female main character don’t get together by the end.  I will go happily read a fantasy novel that is not A Song of Fire and Ice where that doesn’t happen by the end of the novel or series.  Leave a comment down below as I’m always looking for more to read.  Or give me a detective novel where the bad guy isn’t captured by the end of the novel or the series.  We want our clichés, in the broad sense of the word, and we should not be afraid to embrace them as writers.

In that same vein, we shouldn’t be afraid to write stock characters, like the naïve chosen one.  What we need to do is change how they come about it.  Harry Potter is successful because of how he became the chosen one.  Yes, there is a prophecy that he is the one to vanquish the Dark Lord (hello fantasy clichés - a two for one) but there were two who could have fit that prophecy.  How different is Harry Potter if Neville Longbottom was the one that Voldemort picked?  How successful would that story have been if Neville was the main character and gone through everything Harry did?  It’s too much of a stretch, considering how Neville is introduced and written until the seventh book where he shines.  He’s the one who kills Nagini with the Gryffindor sword and kept up Dumbledore’s Army while Harry’s off saving the world.  Would J.K. Rowling have written Neville differently if Neville was the one Voldemort gone after?  Or would Neville be dead and the Harry Potter series a lot darker?  We don’t know because the cliché was kept of the naïve chosen one who, despite his limited faults, vanquished evil and the world is better for it.

That is one big example on how clichés can work.  I can go on, and will if anybody wants me to, but you get the idea.  Clichés are good if you can wrap them up all bright and shiny and new.  The advice for today is as same as I gave at the top of the post.  Embrace your clichés in the genre you’re writing.  You can use them, you’ve just got to make them interesting.  It’s the same as in everything in life.  You’ve got an amazing idea, that others have done, but you have a different take.  It is not wrong to keep to what we’ve read as they get through.  Unless the publication industry is going to shut down completely, we’re going to keep on reading clichés.  Why not take the old clichéd advice and write what you know?  As shown time and time again, it works.


Until next time, keep on writing.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

[Book Review] Women's Murder Club Books 1-4

In my defense, it was either this or talking about music and writing some more like I did on this week's vlog.  It's not pretty but feel free to go ahead and watch it if you want to.  So, a book review.  Oh, but not just one book, four of them!  It's a series and I gobble them up in a span of two to three days (James Patterson has a gift y'all), so why not talk about more than one?  Makes sense to me, makes sense to you, and makes sense to the rest of the world.  Or at least I hope it does by the end of you reading this post.

So the books are, in order, 1st to Die, 2nd Chance, 3rd Degree, and 4th of July.  If you notice, they all have numbers in the title and all listed by the "number in title" part of the 2015 Reading Challege.  He's up to book 13 in the series and I said that I was going to read all of them this year.  I'm praying hard that he doesn't come out with a new book in the series this year.  He could.  James Patterson is known for being the Speedy Gonzales of the writing world.  He has five active series and this year will see... Wikipedia says three books.  I say someone hasn't updated the article considering last year he came out with seven books.  For all I know he might be slowing down but I love the fact that he can do so much in writing all these different series.  It is something that I aspire to be in my writing.

Back to the books themselves, they are an insanely fast read.  I could read them faster, if I just sat and read, but I do have other things to do with my life.  It's set in San Francisco, which is a place that I would like to visit but won't cry tears over if I don't, and there's one main character, Lindsey Boxer, and the three major characters - Cindy Thomas, Claire Washburn, and Jill Bernhardt (later Yuki Castellano) that orbit around Lindsey.  This is shown in the first book, the introduction to the series, and then cemented into place in the second book.  It's more commonplace by the third and fourth book, continuing on through the rest of the series.  You get their personal issues, to feel more attached to the characters, rather than just the case that they're working on.  For example, in the first book, Lindsey has a life threatening medical issue that is the entire secondary plot line of the book.  In the second book, you get to see Cindy more in a relationship with someone who they thought was targeted by the killers they're looking for and so on.  I think it's one of the hooks that work well with the series and I do hope that it continues on.  I'll chime in later reviews if it doesn't.

So that's the nutshell of the books - there's a case and there's the personal lives of the club that revolve around the case.  It's interesting because I know, in a later book, that something happens where Lindsey's personal life and professional life collide in a not good way and she misses a promotion.  It'll be interesting to read due to, at this point, having her be nearly all about her job.  She's got a boyfriend who is in the FBI, but other than that, it's really the job.  I mean, she's got a dog, which was a nice touch instead of a cat, but her life is very one note at the beginning.  It works because these are mystery/thriller and not straight up literature or chick lit.  It's nice that there's a closeness and it blurs the line a small bit sometimes between mystery and chick lit but still stays mystery.  It's not as bloody as, say, his Alex Cross series (Along Came a Spider is the first book of that series, also a movie) but it has enough to make it a mystery series.

So, I highly recommend them, especially if you're looking for a quick read.  The chapters are small, the writing is tight and you want to know what happens next, and you'll enjoy yourself.  None of them are creepy and yes, you might find them get formulaic, but they're worth it.  My favorite type of brain candy as it's smart enough to keep me reading and yet candy enough to make me feel like I'm having a delicious literary treat.

Monday, January 26, 2015

Random Progress Post: Writing Outside of Your Genre

Subtitle: Where Liz rants about writing detective fiction and how she's worried she's doing it wrong.  Well there's more than one subtitle to this but that's what I'm going with for the moment.  On the WriYe website, there's a challenge called genre stretch.  It's very much like what you're thinking, where you get a genre that is possibly outside of your comfort zone and you write in it.  It's related to breaking out of your box, but it's more of a month to month challenge vs a yearly challenge.  It can be anywhere from a short story to novel length.  I'm working on making mine into just being a short story, even though it's being slow going.

This month's genre stretch is crime fiction.  Crime fiction can be anything from a detective story to legal drama.  Some authors of crime fiction are James Patterson, John Grisham, Mo Hayder, and Agatha Christie to name a few.  If you've ever watched an episode of Law and Order, that's straight up and down crime fiction with the police and lawyers working together.  Another aspect of crime fiction is the movie Usual Suspects where the point of view comes from the criminal who was at the scene of a crime / worked with the suspects of the crime.  I won't say more, other than you should go watch it and bow down to Kevin Spacey's performance.  For older crime fiction movies, Alfred Hitchcock did a lot such as Vertigo, Rear Window, and Dial M for Murder to name some.  He's got a lot.  For myself, I love crime thriller, considering I've devoured three of James Patterson's Women's Murder Club this month (that post is coming this week around Thursday/Friday), and that I will watch Law and Order repeats (has to have Jerry Orbach and Sam Waterston in it).

So that's the background of crime fiction.  You cannot throw a stone in our society and not find some type of crime fiction.  Now, you'd think that with all of this in society and how much I love crime fiction, that it would be ever so easy to write it.  Haha, no.  I'm learning that quickly that there is no short cut to writing crime fiction.  Also, no matter how much I've watched, I'm second guessing myself on what I'm writing.  Well, the words itself.  The plot overall is wonderful, if reminding me of L&O, but I'll take what I can get.  Basically, a veterinarian was killed in her clinic and they have to figure out who did the murder.  And, of course, there's the red herring suspects and then the real murderer.  See?  Feels L&O-ery but I'll take what I can get.  I do plan to have it done by the end of the month - four days, four sections, ta-da - and have it up sometime mid-February or start of March so people can read it.

New Website

This blog will no longer be update. You can now find me at  my website  where I will be now doing updates. Thank you for following this...